Emma Brumbaugh
10/6/13
D Block Brit Lit
Mr. O’Brien
Epic
“Fale”
Beowulf is
the epic of epic tales in the literary world however, it does not prove to be
epic when it was created into a motion picture. Though there are some promising
aspects of the movie, overall the movie fails just as the heroic character
Beowulf did. I share some of my opinions on Beowulf the movie with Roger Ebert
and the NY times.
I
agree with Roger Ebert when he was describing Angelina Jolie because he was
writing with a sort of mocking/condescending tone. He says, “Oh her character
was nude…except for the shimmering gold plating that obscured certain crucial
areas”. He almost seems like he is poking fun at the idea of having a nude
animated character and questions the necessity of having it. Though there is
(basically) nudity, he mentions that it can still be rated PG-13, implying that
this is due to the fact that she is a naked, animated character though almost
is identical to Angelina Jolie. I also like Ebert’s quote, “I am reasonably
certain that Angelina Jolie does not have spike-heeled feet. That’s right;
feet, not shoes. This quote further calls attention to Jolie’s extremely
sexualized character of Grendel’s mom, and her obscene physiology and
indirectly points out, “Why does she have to look like that?”.
However, an aspect
of Beowulf that is positive is the graphics and the animations. I support the NY Times review describing the
animation and 3D technology in the movie. It says, “We soar over the dramatic
wintry landscape and dodge and duck as a winged dragon snaps in our direction
or spears hurtle our way”. The animations were those similar to those of Polar
Express, a movie who’s unique animation caused the Polar Express to be one of
the most favored animated movies of our time. The setting of snowy Scandinavian
landscape was nicely portrayed by the imagery and animation that had depth and also
detail. The animators also portrayed Grendel correctly and well, though he was gross,
he made the Beowulf movie enticing to watch even though I had to turn away a
few times avoiding the pleasant view of someone’s head being politely ripped
off.
Though the animation is enjoyable
and clay-like, it does sometimes gets excessive with the gory and gross fight
scenes including dozens of limbs and heads being ripped off by force. Grendel
also does not even look that scary, he just looks like a gigantic baby whose
skin went through a blender (gross idea I know). I would have liked, and
audiences probably as well, to see less of a sensitive, giant-baby looking
monster, and more of a strong and powerful scary monster. Instead its almost
funny to watch Grendel destroy the humans because he seriously does remind me
of a baby, especially when he speaks. He is also portrayed as a huge “mommas boy”
again demeaning his scariness level significantly.
The unnecessary
sight of Grendel’s mom’s body, and some self-imploding animations, cause
Beowulf the movie to be an epic “Fale”.
However, the creative directors of this movie, did get Beowulf the hero
correctly. Possibly the only character who seemed to be like that in the movie,
Beowulf is a tough Scandinavian hero who looks just like I imagined him. His
long blonde hair, and his stubbly beard,
Beowulf looks like he can, or
believes he can, beat any monster or enemy that comes his way. If only Beowulf
could have saved the director of the movie from being defeated by movie
critics.
I agree with the fact that Grendel wasn't scary at all and was really weird looking, also think that Angie being Angie in this movie was really weird.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the fact that Grendel wasn't scary at all and was really weird looking, also think that Angie being Angie in this movie was really weird.
ReplyDeleteI like your discussion of how the movie producers portrayed each individual character. I agree that Grendel's portrayed is a bit odd while the portrayal of Beowulf is much more interesting. I also like how you use the term "epic fail" when yo describe the poem.I also like how you incorporated the other reviews into your own review by both agreeing and disagreeing with them.
ReplyDelete